In
the previous section we saw two solved examples. The
first solved example is that of an under reinforced section,
and the second one is that of an over reinforced section. After
solving the two problems, we can say that we can find the depth of NA xu, the stress, and the strain in the steel (all at the ultimate
state), for any given beam section. The stress and strain in concrete
at the ultimate state for both under reinforced and over reinforced beam sections will be 0.447fck
N/mm2
and 0.0035 respectively. Also the stress in steel at ultimate state for an under reinforced section will always be 0.87fy. These do not need any calculation.
But the ability to find the stress and strain in steel and xu for any given beam section is not sufficient. We must be able to 'specify the load' that can be safely applied on the beam.
For this purpose, we must calculate a quantity called 'Ultimate Moment of Resistance'. This is denoted as MuR. We must calculate this quantity for every beam section that is given to us for analysis. So let us see the details about it:
'Ultimate Moment of Resistance', as the name indicates, is the internal Moment of resistance, that the section is able to offer at the ultimate state. So this is the 'maximum' resistance that we can expect from the section because, after the ultimate state, the beam itself will not serve any purpose. We have already seen the various quantities that are required to calculate this internal resistance:
From the fig.3.21 which we have seen earlier, it can be seen that the internal resistance is given by MuR = Tu . z = Cu . z
We can use either Cu or Tu for calculating MuR. Both will give the same result because, for equilibrium, Cu will be equal to Tu.
Thus we can say that we are able to calculate MuR for any beam section. If we apply an external load such that a moment of MuR is produced at the beam section, an equal internal moment of MuR will develop at that section, and so it will reach the ultimate state.
For every beam that is given to us for analysis, we must calculate MuR. Let us calculate MuR for the beams in each of the solved examples 3.1 and 3.2 that we saw in the previous section:
First solved example:
• Thus MuR = Tu . z = 217.78 x 103 x 349.95 = 76212111 Nmm = 76.2
kNm
Second solved example:
• Thus MuR = Tu . z = 387.04 x 103 x 303.37 = 117416324.8 Nmm =
117.42 kNm
The maximum resisting moment that the first beam can offer is 76.2 kNm. If a moment greater than this is applied, the section will fail. But as the steel has already yielded, there will be large deflections, wider cracks etc., at the time of failure. So we will get enough warning.
The
maximum resisting moment that the second beam can offer is 117.42
kNm. If a moment greater than this is applied, the section will fail.
Here the steel has not yielded at ultimate state. So there will not be any deflections, wider cracks etc., at the time of failure.
Thus the failure will be sudden with out any warning.
Now let us see how MuR can be used for specifying safe loads:
We
will discuss this with the help of an example. The fig. below shows
the plan and part section of a slab and beam.
The slab has a total width of 250 + 2950 + 250 = 3450mm. It rests on two of it's opposite edges. On the left edge, the support is a masonry wall, and on the right edge, it is a beam having an effective span of 4000mm. The beam is simply supported on two columns. We are asked to analyze this beam. The cross sectional dimensions are given in the section XX. The reinforcement details are: 3-#16 at an effective depth of 410mm. fck = 20 N/mm2 and fy = 415 N/mm2
It
is an under reinforced section with MuR = 78.39kNm
Now we will discuss about how this result can be used:
So Mu= wu x 42 x (1/8) = 2wu
- - - (1)
The tributary area has a width of 1725mm. So a 1m wide strip will have an area of 1.725 x 1 = 1.725 m2.
But the ability to find the stress and strain in steel and xu for any given beam section is not sufficient. We must be able to 'specify the load' that can be safely applied on the beam.
For this purpose, we must calculate a quantity called 'Ultimate Moment of Resistance'. This is denoted as MuR. We must calculate this quantity for every beam section that is given to us for analysis. So let us see the details about it:
'Ultimate Moment of Resistance', as the name indicates, is the internal Moment of resistance, that the section is able to offer at the ultimate state. So this is the 'maximum' resistance that we can expect from the section because, after the ultimate state, the beam itself will not serve any purpose. We have already seen the various quantities that are required to calculate this internal resistance:
From the fig.3.21 which we have seen earlier, it can be seen that the internal resistance is given by MuR = Tu . z = Cu . z
We
have seen that z = d - 0.416xu. (Eq.3.8)
After finding the stress in steel, we get Tu
= [Stress in steel x Area of steel]
After finding the value of xu,
we get Cu
= 0.362 fck b xu (Eq.3.7)
We can use either Cu or Tu for calculating MuR. Both will give the same result because, for equilibrium, Cu will be equal to Tu.
Thus we can say that we are able to calculate MuR for any beam section. If we apply an external load such that a moment of MuR is produced at the beam section, an equal internal moment of MuR will develop at that section, and so it will reach the ultimate state.
For every beam that is given to us for analysis, we must calculate MuR. Let us calculate MuR for the beams in each of the solved examples 3.1 and 3.2 that we saw in the previous section:
First solved example:
• The
beam is Under reinforced. So the stress in steel = 0.87 x 415 =
361.05 N/mm2
• Force Tu = stress x area = 361.05 x 603.19 = 217781.7495 N = 217.78 kN
• The
depth of NA = xu,U = 120.32 mm. So z = d - 0.416xu = 400 – (0.416 x
120.32) = 349.95 mm.
Second solved example:
• The
beam is over reinforced. The force in steel Tu, and the value of xu,O can be taken from the
final (fifth) cycle. So Tu = 387.04 kN.
• xu,O = 232.28 mm. So z = d - 0.416xu,O = 400 – 0.416 x 232.28 = 303.37
mm.
The maximum resisting moment that the first beam can offer is 76.2 kNm. If a moment greater than this is applied, the section will fail. But as the steel has already yielded, there will be large deflections, wider cracks etc., at the time of failure. So we will get enough warning.
Now let us see how MuR can be used for specifying safe loads:
Plan and part section of slab and beam
The slab has a total width of 250 + 2950 + 250 = 3450mm. It rests on two of it's opposite edges. On the left edge, the support is a masonry wall, and on the right edge, it is a beam having an effective span of 4000mm. The beam is simply supported on two columns. We are asked to analyze this beam. The cross sectional dimensions are given in the section XX. The reinforcement details are: 3-#16 at an effective depth of 410mm. fck = 20 N/mm2 and fy = 415 N/mm2
We
can analyze it as a rectangular section with b= 250, D = 460 and d =
410mm. The results of the analysis are as follows: (calculation steps
are not shown here)
Now we will discuss about how this result can be used:
If
the factored load acting per meter length of the beam is
denoted as wu, then we can write: The factored moment Mu acting on the
beam at mid section is given by:
Now
we will split wu into it's two components:
wu
= wu,DL
+ wu,LL -
- - (2)
Where wu,DL is the factored DL and wu,LL is the factored LL
Characteristic load wDL:
Self
wt. of beam per meter length = .25 x .3 x 25 = 1.875 kN/m - - - (3)
Self
wt. of slab: for this we will use the fig.3.33 below:
Fig.3.33
Loads from slab
The tributary area has a width of 1725mm. So a 1m wide strip will have an area of 1.725 x 1 = 1.725 m2.
So
self wt. of slab = 1.725 x .16 x 25 = 6.9 kN/m - - - (4)
Self
wt. of finishes over slab assuming @ 1kN/m2 = 1.725 x 1 =
1.725 kN/m - - - (5)
DL
of partitions assuming @ 1.25 kN/m2 = 1.725 x 1.25 = 2.16 kN/m -
- - (6)
So
wDL
= sum of (3) to (6) = 12.66 kN/m - - - (7)
This
is the characteristic DL. There can be uncertainties in the magnitude
of possible DL. So we use the load factor 1.5. Thus wu,DL
= 12.66 x 1.5 = 18.99 ≈
19.0
kN/m - - - (8)
Substituting
(8) in (2), we get
wu
=
19.0 + wu,LL
-
- - (9)
Substituting
(9) in (1) we get :
Mu
= 2 (19.0
+ wu,LL
)
= 38 + 2 wu,LL
- - - (10)
But
the maximum value that Mu can take = MuR = 78.39kNm because, this is
the maximum resistance that the beam can offer.
So
we can write Mu = MuR = 78.39 = 38 + 2 wu,LL
- - - (11)
From
this, we get wu,LL = 20.195 kN/m
This
is the LL from 1.725 m2 area. So the LL from 1 m2 area = 20.195/1.725
= 11.7 kN/m2.
But
there may be uncertainties in the LL that can possibly occur during
the life time of the structure. So we cannot specify that this much
load LL can be applied on the slab. We must apply the load factor of
1.5. So we get 11.7/1.5 = 7.8 kN/m2
Thus
we can specify that characteristic LL of 7.8 kN/m2 can be safely
applied on the slab, as far as the safety of the beam is concerned. But this load may not be safe for the slab. MuR of the slab should be determined, and similar calculations should be done separately.
So
by calculating the MuR of a given beam section, we are able to
specify the characteristic loads that can be applied on the beam.
It
may be noted that the above example is only for a demonstration of
the calculation steps. In an actual case, we have to do further
checks like the safety of the slab section, Safety of the masonry wall and columns, check for deflection, check for development length, check for shear, check
for torsion, other possible loads like wind loads and seismic loads,
stability of the structure etc., In short, it should be checked that
all the elements of the structure satisfy the clauses of all relevant codes.
In the next section we will see some more properties of beam sections.
In the next section we will see some more properties of beam sections.
Copyright ©2015 limitstatelessons.blogspot.com- All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment